First-Person Point of View: Sanger Rainsford
The story is primarily told from the point of view of Sanger Rainsford, the protagonist. This means that the reader experiences the events of the story through Rainsford’s eyes and ears. This point of view allows the reader to feel more connected to Rainsford and to experience his fear and anxiety as he tries to survive on the island.
However, first-person point of view also has its limitations. The reader only knows what Rainsford knows, so there are many things that are left unexplained. For example, when Rainsford first meets General Zaroff, he does not know anything about his host’s true intentions. This creates a sense of mystery and suspense, but it also means that the reader is left in the dark until Rainsford figures things out.
Third-Person Limited Point of View: General Zaroff
Later in the story, the point of view shifts to General Zaroff, the antagonist. This is an example of third-person limited point of view, which means that the reader sees the story through the eyes of one character at a time. In this case, the reader gets to see inside Zaroff’s mind and understand his motivations for hunting humans.
This point of view is effective because it allows the reader to see both sides of the conflict. However, it also creates a sense of unease because the reader is forced to sympathize with a character who is doing something morally reprehensible.
Third-Person Omniscient Point of View: The Narrator
The story is also told from the point of view of an omniscient narrator, who knows everything that is happening on the island. This point of view allows the reader to see things that Rainsford and Zaroff do not see, such as the traps that Zaroff has set up to catch his prey.
However, third-person omniscient point of view can also be distancing. The reader does not feel as connected to the characters because they are not experiencing the events firsthand. This can make it harder to empathize with the characters and to feel invested in the outcome of the story.
The Most Dangerous Point of View
So, which point of view is the most dangerous in “The Most Dangerous Game”? The answer is all three. Each point of view has its strengths and weaknesses, and together they create a complex and suspenseful narrative.
First-person point of view allows the reader to experience Rainsford’s fear and anxiety, which makes the story more immersive. Third-person limited point of view allows the reader to understand Zaroff’s motivations, which creates a sense of moral ambiguity. And third-person omniscient point of view allows the reader to see things that the characters do not, which adds to the suspense.
In conclusion, “The Most Dangerous Game” uses multiple points of view to create a complex and suspenseful narrative. Each point of view has its strengths and weaknesses, but together they create a story that is both thrilling and thought-provoking. Whether you are a fan of first-person, third-person limited, or third-person omniscient point of view, there is something in this story for everyone.